Monday, October 21, 2019
Essay on human needs and motivation The WritePass Journal
Essay on human needs and motivation Introduction Essay on human needs and motivation IntroductionREFERENCESRelated Introduction This essay will be discussing what isà human needs ,à it will explore by looking into human needs and how human needs can impact on human wellbeingà either positively or negatively, it will highlightà government effort in meetingà its people needs,à theà essay will be guided and directed by references from Gough à Doyle,à Frank Fieldà andà some other researcher in human psychology and social welfare. In this regard,à my discussion will focus on the United Kingdomà context and comparing with some underdeveloped countries. It will summarize by some suggestion onà the different à betweenà needsà andà wants. In 1943, Abrahamà Maslowââ¬â¢sà article (A theory of Humanà Motivation).States thatà human needs cannot be satisfied and that lower needs are needs to be address before higher needs.à à These needs were dubbed deficiency needs. While a person is motivated to fulfil these basal desires, they continue to move toward growth, and eventually self-actualization. Goughà à Harrisà 1986) notedà that ,unsatisfied needs can cause serious harm à Doyal Goughà 1991-)highlighted in their matrix of human needsà which consist of: Universal Goal. à Basic need. Intermediate need. Societal precondition for needs satisfaction. They group these characteristic in eleven categories: adequate nutritional food and water, adequate protective housing, non hazardous workà andà physical environment, appropiateà healthà care, security in childhood, significant primary relationship, physical and economic security, safe birth control and child bearing, and appropriate cross cultural education, nine of this apply to all people needs, whereas ,One of these refer to According to (Doyalà à Gough 1991) in (The theory of human needs) . Needs refer implicitly if not explicitly to a particular categories of goal which are believed to be universal sable, whereas want are goals which derive from an individual preferences and cultural environment. child security and welfare, the second refer to specific need of woman in child bearing. Inà discussing Doyal Gough theory:à although : Doyal Gough ,à highlightedà nine of their matrix of humanà needs asà all people needs,à however,à the child security and welfare, and the specific need for women in child bearing are also specific and important need.à Needsà haveà hierarchyà that start with the basic need toà hierarchy top of need,à needsà areà interwoven and inter chained ,à The other nine ofà Doyal Goughà matrix of human need , for example, nutritionalà food and water, housing, health care, education, child bearingà and security in childhoodà are all human basic needs which are provided by the social welfare system,à Gough Harris notedà that if some basic need are not met , this will lead to some serious harm,à for exampleà lack of food and water can lead to hunger and illness, lack of housing leads to homelessness , safety vulnerability, and hopelessness,à children in these situation will lack education,à à live and grow in poverty and become poor adults. Frank Field (2010) in his ( Poverty and Life Chances) said that:poverty is more than lack of money , and furtherà says how poverty can effect children to adulthoodà as a result of poverty experience by their parent. According à to à Frankà Field (2010).à In trying to tackle child poverty,à à the governmentà reviewedà theà past three decadesà Child Poverty Action Group plan, and subsequentlyà à the recommendations that followà wasà the 2010 Child Poverty Actà . The Review reflects how theà ideas on combating poverty have developed . The Review proposes that the countryââ¬â¢s efforts to make the life chances of all children more equal should be brought to bear through whatà à Frankà Fieldà called the Foundation Years. The 2010 Act was a welcomed initiatives of the last Labour Government. The press reported that when the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, announced in March 1999 that the Governmentââ¬â¢s goal was the abolition of child poverty by 2020, his audience at Toynbee Hall was taken by surprise. A surprise it may have been, but the speech gave form and direction to the Governmentââ¬â¢s anti-child poverty strategy. The announcement instantly transformed the ranking on the political agenda of the issue of poverty in a rich society. How best to abolish child poverty became a topic of high political importance ââ¬â a ranking that it had not held since the Attlee Government. Few other post war political initiatives have had such an enduring impact on the political debate and on policy. This heightened political importance of countering child poverty was thankfully matched by action.à à à Frank Field (2010). The developed worldà likeà the UK, USA, and many other developed countries have over a long period of timeà being investing on social services,à education, housing and health care, although the benefits of these decades of Governmentà budgetingà and initiatives towards meeting its people needs are less felt by the populace because of population increase, high volume of migrant migration,à increasedà child birth,à unemployment, inflation,à worldwide economicà crisis,à and increased dependent onà socialà welfareà services. even though people are still complaining of government not meeting their obligation owed to her people, people in the developed world are much more better off in terms of the welfare services available to them, it is mandatory for parents to take their children to school in the UK,à there are other social welfare servicesà entitlements which even though not enough, but it stillà help in reducing hunger and homeles sness. Can national social policy in an era of globalisation serve either the interest of capitals or the need of the people,à Fieldà answer to the question isà (NO) he said that the need of capital and the need of the people are irreconcilably opposed and there little or nothing the welfare state can do about it in todayââ¬â¢s world. Frank Field (2010) In the developing world.à It is the opposite,à people have to fend for themselves without no government social welfare service ,à no government health care service,à education is for those who can afford it,à it is pathetic,à butà people are used toà not relying on government service, which is not even in existence,à rather the people has aà nuclear family way of helping each other. Where the entire members of the family contributes and help any of the family members who is in need,à be it lacking food,à illness, unemploymentà and educating the younger oneà within the nuclearà family. This essay has discussed what is human needs and how they interlinkà to the human existence, it has briefly discussà theà UKà Governmentà initiatives towards enhanced social welfareà servicesà that met the people needs, it summarise by comparing the developed world social welfare services and the undeveloped world non social welfare situation. REFERENCES Doyal Gough (1991) Matrix of Human Needs: The of capital and the need of people: can the welfare state reconcile the two?à Recommended reading literature journal. Frankà Field ( 2010) Foundation Years: Preventing poorà children becoming poor adults: In the report of the independent review on poverty and life chances. HM Government- London. Gough à Harris (1986) Capitalism and Welfare: In The of capital and the need of people: can the welfare state reconcile the two?à Recommended reading literature journal. Maslowà Abrahamà (1943). Hierarchy of needs:A Theoryà of Humanà Motivation: In Towards a Psychology of being.à Psychologyà Review. www.cochranelibrary/psychologyjournal.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.